Monday 21st June: How do you deal with hate speech on social? [GB News story unrelated]

Morning! Today's Media Roundup is brought to you by Chris.

Get past the well-duh nature of the headline and this article on Nieman Lab has a couple of tantalising nuggets of wisdom for newspapers. We've long known that moderating comments is a challenge - even the Times and the FT have told me in the past that choosing how to police its under-article comments sections are a real headache - but deciding exactly where the line is drawn can be difficult.

This article, summarising a new study by the Center for Media Engagement at the University of Texas, Austin, breaks down what the public sees as worthy of removal. Profanity - of which we are avowed fans at Media Voices - is lower down the list of criteria for removing a comment than hate speech. That makes sense, though what is classed as 'hate speech' is obviously harder to determine.

What's really interesting though, is what impact those removals have on the relationship between audience and outlet: "In the U.S. and the Netherlands, participants found moderators removing hate speech to be more trustworthy than those who removed profanity."

This is an interesting one and it's tricky to square with the attitude to covering local court news in the UK. For the Washington Post Erik Wemple argues that news outlets should refrain from covering petty misdemeanours as it adds little value to subscribers and - crucially - is a weight around the neck of the people written about in perpetuity.

Bad news for The Athletic. After a previous failure to merge with Axios the sports specialist subscription service's potential acquisition by the NYT has fallen apart. We still think it would have been a smart get-subscribers-quick scheme for the NYT but reportedly the parties couldn't come to terms on a price. So where now for The Athletic, which is seemingly desperate to get snapped up?

As referred to in this week's episode (see below). Writing for Irish Times Patrick Freyne makes the case that GB News is failing even by its own low standards. Janine Gibson, meanwhile, argues that we shouldn't be talking about the channel at all as that's exactly what it wants to fuel its culture war-based revenue model.

This week's episode:

This week we hear from Jasper Wang, VP of Revenue & Operations for Defector Media. Defector was formed after a mass staff exodus from former GO Media property Deadspin after an internal dispute about who knew its audience best. Defector is now an employee-owned and operated news site that has introduced measures specifically to ensure its staff have a say in the business, even as they write for its audience.

We'd love your thoughts on the podcast: Do you find the interviews valuable? Is there a way we could make the news round-ups more useful for you? Team Media Voices is all ears - simply reply to this email to let us know your thoughts.

P.S. If you haven't listened yet, you can find Media Voices on all good podcast platforms, or listen on our website.